11 September 2026
Mayon Alert Level 2 has not changed since 5 August, and PHIVOLCS now calls it decreased unrest. The sulfur figures, and what the readings do not settle.
Mayon Alert Level 2 is unchanged as of the PHIVOLCS bulletin dated 11 September 2026, which describes the volcano’s condition as decreased unrest. Sulfur dioxide output was measured at 5,363 tonnes on 10 September, down from the 7,115 tonnes recorded on 31 August that drew a round of warnings, and still above the 3,844 tonne daily average since the alert was raised on 5 August.
Both readings are real. Neither one changes the alert level, and that’s the part worth holding onto.
The current PHIVOLCS Mayon bulletin says the volcano is on Alert Level 2 in a state of decreased unrest, with 5,363 tonnes of sulfur dioxide measured on 10 September and 7 volcanic earthquakes in the past 24 hours. Six monitored parameters as published for 11 September 2026:
| Parameter | Reading |
|---|---|
| Alert Level | 2, described as decreased unrest |
| Seismicity | 7 volcanic earthquakes |
| Sulfur dioxide flux | 5,363 tonnes per day, measured 10 September |
| Crater glow | Fair, visible to the naked eye |
| Plume | Obscured |
| Ground deformation | Inflation of the edifice, with short-term deflation on the northeastern sector |
The standing prohibitions haven’t moved either. Entry into the six-kilometre Permanent Danger Zone is not allowed, and neither is flying aircraft close to the volcano.
One reading got reported as a surge because 7,115 tonnes on 31 August was close to double the running average, and it arrived alongside twelve low-frequency earthquakes and swelling detected on the northern and eastern flanks. On its own that is a genuine signal and PHIVOLCS flagged it as one.
What the coverage couldn’t include, because it hadn’t happened yet, is the next ten days. Put the three figures in order and the shape changes:
| Date | Sulfur dioxide, tonnes per day |
|---|---|
| Average since 5 August | 3,844 |
| 31 August | 7,115 |
| 10 September | 5,363 |
A single day is a data point. Three are the beginning of a line. The number came down, it hasn’t come down to baseline, and the agency’s own summary word moved from a caution about possible renewed eruptive activity to decreased unrest.
Mayon Alert Level 2 means moderate unrest: the volcano is showing activity above its normal background, driven by shallow magma or hydrothermal processes, and the standing response is a closed six-kilometre radius rather than an evacuation order. It sits in the middle of a scale that runs from 0 to 5.
The level is a decision, not a measurement. PHIVOLCS raises or lowers it by reading several parameters together, which is why a single figure moving in either direction does not move the level on its own. That is exactly what the past five weeks have shown.
| Level | What it signals |
|---|---|
| 0 | No alert, normal background |
| 1 | Low-level unrest |
| 2 | Moderate unrest, where Mayon sits now |
| 3 | Increasing tendency toward a hazardous eruption |
| 4 | Hazardous eruption possible within days |
| 5 | Hazardous eruption in progress |
Decreased unrest is not the same as safe, and the alert level is the proof. Mayon Alert Level 2 has held since 5 August without interruption, through both the spike and the decline.
The hazards PHIVOLCS lists at Mayon Alert Level 2 have not been withdrawn:
That third one deserves attention in September. Lahar risk is a rainfall problem sitting on top of a volcano problem, and it doesn’t wait for the alert level to rise.
Mayon reached Alert Level 3 in June 2023 and stayed there for months, which is the last sequence most residents will have in mind. The difference between that and now is the direction of travel and the response it triggers.
At Alert Level 3 the danger zone widens beyond six kilometres and evacuation of permanent danger zone communities becomes the operating assumption rather than a contingency. At Mayon Alert Level 2 the six-kilometre radius is the whole restriction, and nothing in the 11 September bulletin asks for more than that.
Worth saying plainly: nothing in the current readings indicates a move to Level 3. Nothing in them rules it out either, and PHIVOLCS does not forecast level changes in a 24-hour bulletin.
Four things this data does not settle, and each one matters before anyone treats the decline as an all-clear:
The fourth is the one a resident can actually act on, and it’s the one no volcano bulletin will answer. We have tracked what the public record showed about earlier Mayon evacuees before, and the same gap applied then.
Residents should watch three things on Mayon: the alert level itself, the daily sulfur dioxide figure measured against the 3,844 tonne average for this episode, and rainfall, separately from the volcano. Read the PHIVOLCS bulletin rather than the headline that summarises it, because the bulletin publishes every parameter and a headline publishes one.
PHIVOLCS publishes a 24-hour summary for Mayon every day, in English and Filipino, in the same place. It costs a minute to read the actual parameters, and that’s the difference between knowing the alert level and guessing at it.
Mayon Alert Level 2 didn’t change. Between 31 August and 11 September the sulfur figure roughly halved the gap back toward its average, the earthquake count fell, PHIVOLCS changed its own summary word, and Mayon Alert Level 2 stayed exactly where it has been since 5 August.
A number moving isn’t the same as a status changing. On a volcano that distinction is the whole point of having alert levels, and the six-kilometre zone stays closed either way.
Source PHIVOLCS, reported 11 September 2026. Written from the original report.
Published 11 September 2026. Every figure on this site carries its source and the date it was read. Where our data comes from. Something wrong here?